Your search for 'rates' returned 2163 results.

Annual report 2015-2016

holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under

Agenda

follow.  The current Cost Benefit Ratio has 10+ ratings whereas the new two stage process has four.  A new Very High rating has been introduced.  Consultation is open until 21 April 2017. FR will draft a regional submission for the RTAG to review via email. DCs indicated that they are unlikely to submit separately at an organisational level.  The draft IAF for PT will be released on 27 April 2017. Long Term Strategic View (LTSV) WW introduced the LTSV, with key

Site 82

field of science for many people. The programmes undertaken are extremely wide-ranging and include national bird counts, water quality measurement, pest free programmes, wetland restoration, intertidal diversity studies and lizard monitoring. I expect schools to hear more about and have greater involvement with citizen science in the next few years. Building developments are progressing at a fast rate at Pukeiti with the official opening expected in

Rules applying to open coast

Administrative charges 1.1(d), 2.1, 2.3, 5.4, 9.3, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7 Discharge of petroleum dispersants into water or onto land in the coastal marine area C2.4 • Dispersant is used in the event of a marine oil spill; • Discharge is of a dispersant of petroleum approved for use in marine oil spills by the Maritime Safety Authority; • Dispersant is applied at the rates and by the methods recommended by the manufacturer; Permitted page 8 •

Annual report 2015-2016

During the period under review, Port Taranaki Ltd obtained a ‘high’ rating for environmental and administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents. Suspended solids remained well below consent limits it all samples analysed. There were no recorded incidents. The environmental performance of Port Taranaki Ltd has continued to improve from previous years. During the same period, Downer New Zealand Ltd, Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd, Methanex New Zealand and New Zealand Oil

Annual report 2013-2014

regions resources. Evaluation of environmental performance 1.1.4 Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is

Report and recommendation on Urenui Beach seawall (2007)

job to be completed before there is more land erosion, and to avoid costs of temporary measures. Seeks for the wall to be finished with no conditions. Ian Noel Bullock Support N To ensure the foreshore camping and recreational facilities can be kept safe and intact for the future Ian Parker Support N Completion of the wall as soon as possible to stop erosion. Jason Quickenden Support N Installation of rock wall to stop erosion of Urenui Beach. It is costing rate payers money to try and

Annual report 2013-2014

observable and/or ongoing effects upon soil and groundwater quality associated with the land disposal process • effective incorporation of material, application rates and associated earthworks • integrity and management of storage facilities • dust and odour effects in proximity of the site boundaries • housekeeping and site management • the neighbourhood was surveyed for environmental effects. 1.5.4 Chemical sampling During the monitoring period the Council collected six composite

Pātea Beach greenwaste monitoring 2020-2021

the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as