page 168 Appendix 6: Charging Policies Resource Management Act Charging Policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $92/hr $87/hr Professional/supervisory staff $116/hr $108/hr Managers $168/hr $157/hr Support staff $92/hr $87/hr Directors
refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with
current year. They also generate 319 full-time equivalent jobs (FTEs). The Port’s important enabling role can be seen from the estimates that its users and service providers are likely to generate $353 million in Value Added (GDP) the current year, and 929 FTEs. The Port also plays an important role in other ways. It facilitate the imports and exports of the Region’s industries, the dividends it pays help to keep the Regional rates burden in check, and it sponsors and supports
floating platforms was practicable and materially different from imagining ‘a no scheme’ environment. The Ngāti Rangi decision observed that not following Port Gore when assessing the effects of a proposal in the context of that case would be to “lock in” hydro-electricity water takes and flow rates for as long as the controlled activity status was retained, thereby preventing adverse effects from being avoided or mitigated.10 In support of its finding, the Court highlighted the
landscape and visual effects of the proposal in the context of the site and the wider landscape setting, as well as effects on key public views. This assessment has been prepared with reference to the NZILA Best Practice Note Landscape Assessment and Sustainable Management 10.1 in conjunction with Information requirements for the assessment of landscape and visual effects”2. The effects ratings and definitions used in Table 1 are provided in Appendix B. To determine the overall nature and
performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by WestSide, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with WestSide’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. As Greymouth Petroleum Limited was unable to estimate the rate or volume of the take, and as such, may exceed the limits of the permitted activity Rule [Rule 48 of the RFWP], the take of groundwater fell for consideration under Rule 49 of the RFWP as a controlled activity. The standards of Rule 49 require that: • The abstraction shall cause not more than a 10% lowering of
performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
agricultural land use within the Taranaki region. The New Zealand Dairy Statistics (published by LIC and Dairy NZ) for the 2011-12 year indicate that the total area utilised for dairy farming in the Taranaki region is 170,968 hectares. The region supports a total of 1,731 dairy herds comprising a total of 484,204 cows. The average stocking rate across the region is 2.83 cows per hectare and average milk-solids production is 358 kg per cow. The Taranaki region accounts for approximately 10.4% of the