and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during
floating
platforms was practicable and materially different from imagining ‘a no scheme’ environment. The
Ngāti Rangi decision observed that not following Port Gore when assessing the effects of a
proposal in the context of that case would be to “lock in” hydro-electricity water takes and flow rates
for as long as the controlled activity status was retained, thereby preventing adverse effects from
being avoided or mitigated.10 In support of its finding, the Court highlighted the
Walkways and Cycleways Strategy
SDC Stratford District Council
SH State Highway
SHIP State Highway Investment Proposal
SIG Special Interest Group
SNP Safe Network Programme
SPR Special Purpose Road
STDC South Taranaki District Council
STE Stock Truck Effluent
TAIP Transport Agency Investment Proposal
TEFAR Targeted Enhanced Financial Assistance Rate
TIO Transport Investment Online
TP Transport Programme
TRC Taranaki Regional Council
TSIG
page
3
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
staff initiated a more
comprehensive investigation into the effects of activities on localised groundwater in the
vicinity of the landfarming facility. The monitoring in 2011-2012 showed that effects of site
activities were detected in the groundwater in the immediate vicinity of the storage area.
The Council’s concerns over the extent of control of wastes while in storage meant that the
Company’s overall performance in the 2011-2012 year was rated as ‘good’ rather than ‘high’.
Upon further
16
9.4.4 Deductions for non-compliance of performance standards 16
Financial incentive mechanism 16 9.5
9.5.1 Rationale 17
9.5.2 Areas of influence for the Service Provider 17
9.5.3 Assessment period 17
9.5.4 Fare changes 17
9.5.5 Sources of revenue 17
9.5.6 Sources of information 18
SuperGold Card Scheme 18 9.6
10. The Service 19
Service Provider to provide the service 19 10.1
Duty to carry passengers 19 10.2
11. Vehicles 20
Operator rating system 20 11.1
of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
resources.
1.1.3 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site
for the period under review included 12 site inspections
of Port Taranaki Limited, Downer New Zealand Limited and Technix Taranaki Terminal
Limited (nine routine inspections and three follow up), 11 site inspections of Methanex
Motunui Limited and ten at New Zealand Oil Services Limited. Water samples were collected
for physicochemical analysis on selected inspections.
During the two year period under review, Port Taranaki Limited obtained an ‘improvement
required’ rating in 2012-2013 and