for the period under review included 12 site inspections
of Port Taranaki Limited, Downer New Zealand Limited and Technix Taranaki Terminal
Limited (nine routine inspections and three follow up), 11 site inspections of Methanex
Motunui Limited and ten at New Zealand Oil Services Limited. Water samples were collected
for physicochemical analysis on selected inspections.
During the two year period under review, Port Taranaki Limited obtained an ‘improvement
required’ rating in 2012-2013 and
Agenda for Taranaki Regional Transport Committee 1 June 2016
Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their …
sensitive macroinvertebrate taxa, and
higher respiration and decay rates.
> 0.006 and ≤ 0.010 > 0.021 and ≤ 0.030
C
Ecological communities are impacted by moderate DRP
elevation above natural reference conditions. If other
conditions also favour eutrophication, DRP enrichment
may cause increased algal and plant growth, loss of
sensitive macro-invertebrate and fish taxa, and high rates
of respiration and decay.
> 0.010 and ≤ 0.018 > 0.030 and ≤ 0.054
D
the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
2013/14
Actual
2012/13
Actual
2011/12
Actual
2010/11
Actual
2009/10
Actual
2008/09
General rates $7.61m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m $7.18m $7.18m $6.85m $5.7m $5.5m
Percent change 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5% 0% 4.82% 20.2% 3.3% 2.4%
General rates to
income
28.5% 28.7% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9% 31.6% 36.2% 31.8% 35.5% 32.1%
Rates per $100,000
capital value
$15.55 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18 $19.47 $17.34 $17.25 $12.96 $14.77
Total
development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
not walking all over them and
looking after the plants that grow on them.
Table 22 State of the Environment Report – Mean annual observed coastline change
(metres/year)
Location Rate Location Rate
Waitara East -1.37 Paritutu Beach -0.45
Waitara West -0.54 Herekawe West -0.29
New Plymouth Airport -0.60 Omata -0.43
Bell Block Beach -0.32 Waireka -0.25
Waiwhakaiho East -0.31 Oakura Beach (variable) -0.20
Waiwhakaiho West -0.67 Stony River Mouth +1.53
ventilation at reducing odour emission
rates by optimising ventilation, resulting in lower flowrates and a lower efflux of
odour, also commensurate with lower ammonia levels as demonstrated by the
chicken feet pad numbers as achieved at Midhurst and as described by Mr Whiting.
16 Mr Van Kekam6 has quoted his experience with the use air dispersion modelling to
determine the peak off-site 1-hour average 99.5%ile odour concentrations
(expressed as odour units per cubic metre of air