re-evaluate its approach and that of
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of
methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s
and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
Economic Profile – GDP measured in 2020 prices.
3 Measured as the Modified Employment Count (MEC) to include both employees and working
proprietors
page
Page | 6
20. New Plymouth is the dominant city in the region (with two-thirds of regional
population), with a network of rural service towns. Taranaki Region’s
population reached 124,600 people in 2020. Between 2000 and 2020 the
region’s population grew by 0.8% per annum, a lower rate than national
extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to
REVIEW 55
List of tables
Table 1 National marine bathing guidelines 8
Table 2 Marine bathing water quality in Taranaki and other regions (1999/2000) 9
Table 3 Coastal permits issued in each coastal management area 1997 to 2002 10
Table 4 Structural and coastal improvements involving resource users 1997 to 2002 13
Table 5 Council rating system for compliance monitoring (2001/02) 14
Table 6 MfE survey results on the consents process (1999/2000) 22
Table 7 Sources of repeated
Tūpare Asset Management Plan 2017.
report.
1.3.2 Water abstraction permit (groundwater)
Section 14 of the Act stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any
water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by resource consent or a rule in a
regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14.
The Council determined that the application to take groundwater fell within Rule 49
of the Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki (RFWP) as the rate and daily volume of
the groundwater
its approach and that of consent holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to GPL’s
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to GPL’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year.