(reported) minor injuries or damage only crashes. The KiwiRap Taranaki Regional Results 2012 give SH43 a low collective risk rating (average annual fatal and serious crashes per km) and a high personal risk rating (average annual fatal and serious crashes per 100 million vehicle-km) for the period 2007-2011. Table 2.1 SH43 Traffic Volumes 2011 to 2015 page Our Ref: Issue Date: 6 State Highway 43 Investigation Final v5.docx 25 July 2017 2.3
refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual
of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
part of that invoice is in dispute. 2.3 If the Customer fails to make payment to the Council in accordance with the payment instructions on the invoice within the due date for payment, the Council may charge interest on the unpaid sum noted in the invoice at a rate of 12% per annum for the period between the due date for payment and the date of actual payment. If payment of the invoice (and any interest amounts) remains unpaid, the Council may in its discretion and on reasonable notice
Discretionary May be non-notified without written approval • Location of discharge • Effects on conservation values and ecosystems • Effects on water quality • Erosion effects • Values and ecosystems • Contingency planning to prevent contaminant discharges • Quality of discharge and possible treatment before discharge • Volume and rate of discharge • Duration of consent • Monitoring • Review • Administrative charges 1.1(a), 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 4.1, 5.4, 9.3, 9.6, 9.7
supplemented by additional reporting as required. This will enable councillors to raise any matters of concern. 20. The Council can revoke the delegation at any time or when the Covid-19 has clearly passed. 21. For everyone's information the powers that cannot be delegated are: the power to make a rate the power to make a bylaw the power to borrow money, or purchase or dispose of assets, other than in accordance with the long-term plan the power to adopt a long-term …
responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder, this report also assigns a rating as to the Company’s environmental and
utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
the following regional councils: Auckland Regional Council, Environment Canterbury, Horizons, Northland, Wellington, Otago, Hawkes Bay and Environment Waikato. Several of these councils have key performance indicators (KPIs) that set targets for customer satisfaction, e.g. ARC – ‘At least 75% of customers are satisfied with the resource consent process’, Greater Wellington – ‘60% of recent applicants and existing consent holders rate level of satisfaction as excellent or very good’. Of