Coastal Plan submissions A-F
Coastal Plan submissions A-F
Coastal Plan submissions A-F
Remediation hearing - submitters' expert evidence - Ngāti Mutunga (Anne-Maree Mckay attachment to evidence)
and the rate payer doesn't need the burden of another councilor, even though it states NO I bet there will be extra costs. If we are truly "one people" then why do we need a dual way for some people to get elected. Sounds very unfair and racist. Please give this very careful consideration. page Page 1 of 3 / Theresa Adamski Submission Submission to Taranaki Regional Council on whether to establish a Māori constituency. Name: Theresa Adamski 1) I would like to
NPS-FM, water use is managed by setting environmental flows and levels, taking into account any changes that are likely to occur as a result of climate change. Limits can then be set on the rate and amount of water taken, and where and when that water can be abstracted. Monitoring of water use ensures that people comply with the relevant rules and regulations. The Council’s current Regional Freshwater Plan requires that 66% of the mean annual low flow
cannot be proven). page 3 1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
undertaking successful enforcement action. Commentary/Highlights Consent holders are assessed each year on their environmental performance and on consent compliance. The performance is publicly reported. Overall ratings for consent holders in the 2018/2019 year were found to be 83% ‘high’ and 13% ‘good’. Reporting of the 2017/2018 programmes was completed, with the final suite of annual reports presented to Council in April 2019. Ninety-seven annual reports together with four
sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
groundwater samples, and 6 surface water samples. This report outlines all of the consents held by the STDC, reports on the baseline monitoring activities carried out in the 2012-2013 period, and discusses the results. STDC demonstrated a high level of compliance with its resource consents. No rating is given for environmental effects as no discharges or in-stream works have yet to occur. No incidents were recorded by Council in regards to this site during the period under review. This
methods, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities