proven).
Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned
development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
of the performance and extent of compliance by
the NPDC during the period under review, this report also assigns them a rating for
their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to demonstrating
consent compliance in site operations
review, this report also assigns a
rating as to NPDC’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take
Decision of Hearing Panel Remediation NZ Ltd 26 May 2021
consideration (from the IMO
guidelines):
"The decision to allow an offshore installation, structure, or parts thereof, to remain on
the sea-bed should be based, in particular, on a case-by-case evaluation, by the coastal
State with jurisdiction over the installation or structure, of the following matters:
.1 any potential effect on the safety of surface or subsurface navigation, or of other uses
of the sea;
.2 the rate of deterioration of the material and its present and possible
location, operation, and maintenance of
the effluent storage facilities, including the storage volume;
· Location, size and physical characteristics of the irrigation area;
· Application rate and frequency of the discharge, including the
return period between applications;
· Separation distances from property boundaries,
dwellings, places of public assembly, surface water or
bores, wells or springs used for water supply purposes
or from known urupa and marae sites;
·
0-90°) between the trail of
broken white-water and the crest of the unbroken wave as it propagates
shoreward. Low peel angles create fast surfing waves, while angles
approaching 0° result in a closeout, whereby the wave face collapses and
ends the ride. High peel angles create slow waves which are less
challenging to surf. The wave peel rate describes how fast the wave
breakpoint advances laterally along the wave crest, and this is closely
related to the wave peel angle.
Wave breaking
minimise the requirement to abstract surface water.
Often when combined with efficient recycling, the small volumes of surface water
required to be abstracted for washing at quarries fit within the permitted activity rule
(Rule 15) of the Regional Fresh Water Plan for Taranaki.
Whitaker Civil Engineering Limited holds no water abstraction permit. The water
volume and abstraction rate required to service the Company’s operations are less than
50 cubic metres per day and 1.5 litres per second