1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance
during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from
the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the consent
any surface water body;
• The discharge does not result in surface ponding;
• No spray drift enters surface water;
• The discharge does not occur at a rate at which it cannot be assimilated by the
soil/pasture system; and
• The pasture cover within irrigation areas is maintained at all times.
page
22
9. Treated wastewater discharged by irrigation to land shall not have a hydrocarbon
content exceeding 5 % total petroleum hydrocarbon.
10. Discharges irrigated
report also assigns a
rating as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take
holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent
compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as
from a human health perspective (Snelder et al. 2016). Monitored water quality variables were
combined with catchment and land-use data to estimate water quality for all lakes in New Zealand, which
was subsequently used to make predictions of cyanobacterial biovolumes for all lakes. The spatial water
quality attribute models were rated to have satisfactory to good performance according to Snelder et al.
(2016). The most accurate model for cyanobacterial biovolume included
that with the proposed abstraction rate of 3.9 cumecs, the scheme has the potential to
‘flatline’ the lower river, even under scenario 2. An example of this is shown in Figure 3, where the smaller
variations in flow can be completely absorbed by the station. Jowett states in his report that the impacts of low
flows begin to manifest after 30 days. The synthetic natural flow record shows that this occurs most years
(Figure 5, Table 5). Although scenario 2 (no abstraction when flows are in excess
refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by OMV, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental
to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during
best practice. This work is predominantly
considered to be outside the scope of the baseline monitoring programme, however where there are
resultant changes to the baseline monitoring programme, they have been included in this report.
STDC demonstrated a high level of administrative compliance with its resource consents. No rating is given
for environmental effects as none of the consents included in this programme have been exercised.
For reference, in the 2016-2017 year, 74% of