Your search for 'rates' returned 2207 results.

NPDC coastal structures monitoring 2018-2019

the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to NPDC’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with NPDC’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as

NPDC coastal structures monitoring 2017-2018

closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to NPDC’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring

Annual report 2015-2016

must be able to prove by investigation that the identified company is indeed the source of the incident (or that the allegation cannot be proven). 1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental

Annual report 2014-2015

associated with a particular site. If there is potentially an issue of legal liability, the Council must be able to prove by investigation that the identified company is indeed the source of the incident (or that the allegation cannot be proven). 1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s

Biennial report 2012-2014

a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance with