clearly.
We are rate payers to TRC as we own land at Mimi.
Thank you.
Murray & Sarah Peat.
page
Form Name: Maori constituency submission form
Submission Time: March 15, 2021 8:13 pm
Browser: Chrome 88.0.4324.192 / OS X
IP Address: 121.72.15.147
Unique ID: 778409416
Location:
Your details
Name Judith Perrie
Address 10 Pitcairn Street
Oakura 4314
Oakura, New Plymouth 4314
Email judithperrie@hotmail.com
Phone 0211757009
I wish to appear in person at a hearing
scheduled for 6
and fish passes in the Manganui River, and to dam and divert
water in the Manganui River via an existing diversion weir and
intake structure', this application proposes to take and use up to
5.2 m3/s of water from the Manganui River for hydro-electricity
generation purposes by way of diversion to the Motukawa Race
and Lake Ratapiko. This rate of take aligns with the existing take
authorised by Consent 3369-2. Further details of the method of
water take are provided in the attached
achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a high level.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024 year.
page
i
Table of contents
Page
1 Introduction 1
Compliance
of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance
Inspections 16
2.2.2 Discharge monitoring 17
2.2.2.1 Effluent volume 17
2.2.2.2 Nitrogen application rates 17
2.2.3 Soil and herbage monitoring 18
2.2.3.1 Spring 2022 soil and herbage survey 19
2.2.3.2 Autumn 2022 deep soil leaching profiles 19
2.2.4 Groundwater monitoring 19
2.2.4.1 Electromagnetic induction survey 19
2.2.4.2 Groundwater monitoring in relation to effluent irrigation 20
2.2.4.3 Groundwater monitoring in relation to the FECB ammonia plume 22
administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2020-2021 year, consent
levels. This had been addressed through extension of the irrigation disposal
system in 2007-2008, and by more intensive wastewater and groundwater monitoring. During the year
under review, there was a higher nitrogen load applied to the paddocks than in the 2017-2020 years. The
nitrogen application rates increased by about 14% on Farm 1 and 20% on Farms 2 and 3 in the 2019-2020
year, with further increases of 10% on Farm 1, 4% on Farm 2, and 18% on Farm 3 during the year under
review. On Farm 3,
Policy and Planning Committee Agenda Nov 2023 web
ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories
maintenance of the Motukawa HEPS.
Is a structure on, under, or over a river bed required? No
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed
(litres/second)?
8000
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (cubic
metres per day)?
345600
What is the maximum volume proposed to be taken in a
7-day period (m3)?
2419200
Please indicate below how your taking will vary through a typical year
Maximum or near to maximum: Jul
May
Jun
Less than