1007 consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of environmental performance and administrative performance by the consent holder, over the last
several years there have been many non-compliant events,
for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a high level in the year under
review.
This report includes
decommissioning of the water treatment pond was completed with minimal
disturbance and the pasture strike was good, however the soil sampling showed that contaminants
remain above the consent limits in several paddocks. No rating is given for the administrative
performance because there were no requirements for this year. The ratings are defined in Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2022-2023 year consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 878
and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance requires improvement.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024 year, including a recommendation relating to an
optional review of consents
methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable management of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
In addition to discussing the details of the performance and compliance by the consent holder, this report
also assigns a rating to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental
2023/2024 39
9. Setting of Rates 2023/2024 135
10. Appointment of Deputy Harbourmasters and Issuing of Warrants 143
11. Electoral Officers Report on the 2022 Triennial Elections 147
12. Public Excluded
13. Public Excluded Recommendations 165
14. Confirmation of Public Excluded Minutes - Operations and Regulatory April 2023 167
15. Confirmation of Public Excluded Minutes - Executive Audit and Risk 8 May 2023 170
16. Ngāti Maru Joint Management Agreement 173
17. Agenda
monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a
reprioritise the timelines.
5.2 Mr S Bowden, Stratford District Council, spoke to the report updating the committee
on transport activities within the Stratford District. It was noted:
Mayor N Volzke stated that the Stratford District Council would endeavour to
present to the committee members at the next meeting with detail around the
proposed differential targeted rate for Forestry Owners, the current damage being
done, how they would determine whether or not a property is a
impact recreation use
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7
page
132
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I S chedu le 2 – Coas t a l a rea s