2016/17 Actual 2015/16 Actual 2014/15 Actual 2013/14 General rates $10.94m $10.94m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m Percent change 37.6% 37.6% 0% 0% 0% 4.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5% General rates to income 25.9% 22.8% 15.7% 18.3% 18.3% 22.2% 28.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9% Rates per $100,000 capital value $24.13 $24.13 $24.17 $25.80 $25.80 $14.17 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18 Total expenditure $41.2m $49.7m $41.2m $37.8m $37.8m $31.3m
(or multiple documents) in the "Documents" step. If you upload a document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant page number in the text box. Give full details of the source of the discharge and any treatment it will receive prior to discharge: These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached Assessment of Environmental Effects. Liquids discharged to water What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge? Rate 1180.0
keeping 11 2.3.2.1 Rate and time of effluent application 11 2.3.2.2 Area (ha) that effluent is applied and total volume applied 11 2.3.2.3 Method of irrigation 12 2.3.2.4 Type of crops grown 12 2.3.3 Cut and carry operation 12 2.3.4 Total nitrogen and potassium in the effluent 13 2.3.5 Nutrient management 13 2.3.6 Nitrogen loading 13 2.3.7 Potassium loading 14 2.3.8 Cut and carry operation 14 2.4 Incidents, investigations, and interventions 15 page
generally consistent. Ongoing natural character effects will vary between Neutral and Moderate adverse across the various river reaches depending on the presence of structures, the resultant modified flow rates and associated ecological conditions. Within Lake Mangamahoe the ongoing natural character effects are considered to be Low beneficial due to the water and lake margin vegetation creating a valued ecological habitat that offsets the man-made nature of the lakebed, presence of structures and
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor. In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a high level. This report
maintenance of minimum residual flows, provision of abstraction records and all other general conditions of their consent(s). Monitoring found the majority of takes being well managed and operating within relevant consent conditions during the 2021-2022 period. The Council was required to enter three incidents in relation to irrigation consents over this period, with all non-compliances deemed sufficiently minor not to warrant further action from Council. The overall rate of non-compliance
such as total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia and chlorophyll-a. The spatial water quality attribute models were variable in performance however, with the exception of the ammonia criteria, those utilised for this assessment were rated to have satisfactory to very good performance (Snelder et al. 2022). Caution is advised when interpreting absolute values estimated for specific locations with spatial water quality models, due to the associated uncertainty. Models such as these
to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance and administrative compliance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and
their resilience too, and as a region, we’ll continue to rise to the challenge. page 4 The bottom line The changing environment has impacted our budget with spending now forecast to be $46.8m (compared with $45.2m signalled in the 2021/2031 Long-Term Plan). As a result, general rates will move from the proposed 5.5% to 7.9% for 2022/2023, which for most ratepayers will be less than $20 per annum extra. Targeted rates remain consistent with those
Consent 10314-1 14 List of figures Figure 1 The location of the OWSL site and its associated water service area 3 Figure 2 Seven-day volume (consent limit 28,000 m3) 7 Figure 3 Daily abstraction rate (consent limit 50 L/s) 7 Figure 4 Macroinvertebrate index results recorded in the Oaonui Stream in relation to the OWSL Stream Weir, October 2021 9 Figure 5 Macroinvertebrate index results recorded in the Oaonui Stream in relation to the OWSL Stream Weir, March 2022 10