measurements to the
Chief Executive, upon request.
Advice Note:
It is acknowledged that there is potential for inaccurate flow records associated with
measuring the residual flow using water level data, given that a change in the rating curve
may result in there being less flow at the water level recorder than when the previous rating
was in use was established.
As such, in the event that the Taranaki Regional Council identifies (via its river gauging) that
there is
effluent and stormwater into the Waingongoro River, two
consents to discharge effluent and solids to land, two consents for structures in watercourses, and one
consent to discharge emissions into the air at the plant site.
Monitoring is carried out by both the Company and the Council. The Company monitors water abstraction
rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, effluent
loadings and soil and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council
details of the performance and extent of compliance by CCCWSL, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with CCCWSL’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
(NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.6 What is
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through
of the consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 10% of the consents, a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved.
page
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance decreased from high to good (based on
consent ratings related to the compliance issues). However, NPDC’s
compliance by Corteva, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with Corteva’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as
region’s larger estuaries north
and south of the ring plain, as well as a number of smaller
stream mouths where tidal intrusion was marginal but
may occasionally occur. Three main outputs were provided
for each estuary: a habitat map, a vulnerability rating and
recommendations for future monitoring.
Overall vulnerability to the effects of sedimentation and
eutrophication was determined to be ‘high’ in five estuaries,
‘moderate to high’ in another five, ‘moderate’ in