Your search for 'rates' returned 2189 results.

Summary of submissions

present rates to use it. This should never have even been considered. Vote NO 8 Ross Calgher 1 1 We have as ratepayers already paid in the way of our rates many times for this white elephant now you want to on top of what we are paying to fix the disgusting work that has been done, the millions that were spent not years ago upgrading kitchens etc. just before oh Dear we are not earth quake proof. That have not been used???/. That upgrade should not have been done till the

Dairy Farm Practices and Management Report (DairyNZ)

Effluent management aside, Options one and two are similar in expecting water ways fenced and riparian margins managed with timeframes to have this work completed before a regulatory regime is implemented for those yet to meet the deadlines. The major difference between these two policies is implementing land based effluent irrigation in all but exceptional circumstances. In relation to the first two policy options, this report finds that: • If the rate of fencing experienced in the

Council meeting agenda May 2020

sustained. Notification of Annual Plan and rates to be discussed under general business. Late Items Ordinary Meeting - Confirmation of Minutes 6 page 1. Confirmation of Minutes – 25 February 2020 Resolves That the Taranaki Regional Council: takes as read and confirms the minutes and resolutions of the Ordinary Meeting of the Taranaki Regional Council held in the Taranaki Regional Council chambers, 47 Cloten Road, Stratford, on Tuesday 25 …

CPSchedule2

low impact recreation use  The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 page 1 4 6 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R

Schedule 2 - Coastal areas of outstanding value

The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding page 1 2 4 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R A N A K I S c h e d u le 2 – C o a s t a l a r e a s o f o u t s t a n d in g v a lu e Parininihi. page 125 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I

Schedule II: Coastal areas of outstanding value

The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding page 1 2 4 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R A N A K I S c h e d u le 2 – C o a s t a l a r e a s o f o u t s t a n d in g v a lu e Parininihi. page 125 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I

Wai-inu Beach consent monitoring 2020-2021

resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the

Schedules of charges 2022/2023

page 67 Appendices Appendix 1: Charging policies Resource Management Act charging policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $101/hr $96/hr Professional/supervisory staff $128/hr $120/hr Managers $185/hr $173/hr Support staff

Freshwater bodies of outstanding or significant value in the Taranaki region

River was confirmed following the review of the RPS in 2010. Policy 3.1.1 seeks to retain as far as possible in their natural state, the quantities levels and rates of flow of water and the quality of water within the Hangatahua (Stony) catchment. In addition to the objectives and policies seeking to protect the Hangatahua (Stony) River, Policy 6.1.1 of the Freshwater Plan identified two other catchments or reaches where the taking and use of water

Annual report 2015-2016

damage caused by the June 2015 flood. The monitoring showed that overall the scheme was operated well, and within resource consent requirements, with no breaches of lake level requirements, residual flow requirements or rise and recession rate restrictions for the lower Patea River. The Company coordinated a number of investigations and reports during the reporting period. The bulk of the required monitoring has been undertaken prior to the 2015-2016 period, although the current report