assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.4. Map Co-ordinates at point of activity (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM)
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.5. Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.6. Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to
________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
(refer to land title or rates notice)
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.6 What is the name of the river or stream where the activity is
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.3 Map Co-ordinates at point of structure (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
the
region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is
SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with SDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans
consents.
Surface water abstraction was compliant with daily rate and volume. Process water discharges were
compliant with consent defined parameters. Surface water monitoring indicated negligible impacts from the
discharge of process waters. The thermal tolerances within the receiving waters were not exceeded for the
duration of the monitoring period.
Emissions monitoring results from the Taranaki Combined Cycle (TCC) were within consent defined
specifications for the full duration of the
renewed during the review period, and one consent to discharge emissions into the air at the
plant site.
Monitoring is carried out by both the Company and the Council. The Company monitors water abstraction
rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, effluent
loadings and soil and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council undertakes inspections of the plant site and
irrigation areas. Monitoring includes effluent quality checks and