483.15 524.91 235.67 452.45 504.50 376.83 394.60 336.28 452.48 452.48 5,571.98 1,503.83 1,974.83 1,955.88 1,932.59 2,099.63 819.64 1,537.16 2,017.99 1,507.31 1,578.41 1,345.13 1,809.92 1,809.92 21,892.24 Sensibility test Irrigation volume/yr 17,422 - Pumping rate M 3 /hr 30 Week 1
Reference Production Land or on Forested Land regulated by the NES-PF. d) Payment of administrative charges e) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or ambient concentrations of contaminants, or on or relating to mass discharge rates f) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise adverse effects beyond the boundary g) Payment of financial contributions Note: Appendix IX contains information on good management practices to prevent or minimise the
Commentary/Highlights The number of consents processed for the quarter was similar to last year. The 100% consent processing time frame compliance has been maintained, meaning activities are not being delayed. Excellent prehearing success rate for the quarter. No appeals on decisions during the quarter. Outputs/Key performance indications PERFORMANCE MEASURE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE Provide accurate and timely information in response to all appropriate requests for assistance in …
100% consent processing time frame compliance has been maintained, meaning activities are not being delayed. Excellent prehearing success rate for the quarter. No appeals on decisions during the quarter. Outputs/Key performance indications PERFORMANCE MEASURE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE Provide accurate and timely information in response to all appropriate requests for assistance in implementing Regional Plan rules. Timely and appropriate information has been provided
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned …
(titled “A6: Entries Aligned"), or were unaligned (titled “A7: Entries Unaligned"); and (e) A graph showing daily windspeed compared with diary entries with an intensity rating of greater than 0 titled “A8: Windspeed and Odour Entries”. 14 A substantial portion of entries recording odour (44%) were identified as not being aligned with conditions conducive to odour propagation from the site. Most often this was due to the entries being made while the observation address
level of environmental performance during the 2015-2016 year. Of the 20 consents for which compliance and environmental performance could be categorised, 2 (10%) were rated ‘improvement required’ and 18 (90%) were rated ‘high’. The site was generally well managed, however, two incidents resulted from procedural issues that have now been addressed. Water abstraction limits were adhered to. The stormwater system performed well and no impacts were detected in the receiving environments. There
an infringement notice issued as a result of one of the complaints received about the site. During the year, TBS Coatings Limited demonstrated a good level of environmental performance and a high level of administrative performance with the resource consent. An exceedance of the dust deposition rate was observed in two of the six gauges deployed, which may have been the result of re-suspended yard dust. The Company undertook a site clean up as a result of this non-compliance. No
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual
continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and