Your search for 'rates' returned 2314 results.

STDC Closed Landfills Annual Report 2021-2022

through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement

Cheal deep well injection monitoring 2020-2021

the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance

Annual report 2015-2016

and a administrative performance for their two facilities located on the Waitara and Pennington Roads, while environmentally, improvement is required at RNZ’s Mokau Road facility at Uruti, though there administration was rated as good. For reference, in the 2015-2016 year, 71% of consent holders in Taranaki monitored through tailored compliance monitoring programmes achieved a high level of environmental performance and compliance with their consents, while another 24% demonstrated a good

Schedules of charges 2019/2020

page 63 Appendices Appendix 1: Charging Policies Resource Management Act Charging Policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $94/hr $89/hr Professional/supervisory staff $118/hr $110/hr Managers $171/hr $160/hr Support staff $94/hr

Schedules of charges

page 168 Appendix 6: Charging Policies Resource Management Act Charging Policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $92/hr $87/hr Professional/supervisory staff $116/hr $108/hr Managers $168/hr $157/hr Support staff $92/hr $87/hr Directors

Annual report 2016-2017

refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with

Economic Impact of Port Taranaki 2017

current year. They also generate 319 full-time equivalent jobs (FTEs). The Port’s important enabling role can be seen from the estimates that its users and service providers are likely to generate $353 million in Value Added (GDP) the current year, and 929 FTEs. The Port also plays an important role in other ways. It facilitate the imports and exports of the Region’s industries, the dividends it pays help to keep the Regional rates burden in check, and it sponsors and supports

Mckee Mangahewa PS monitoring 2020-2021

achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by Todd Energy, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring