1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
of logging
activity needs to be improved.
Puniwakau road has been destroyed by logging movements, and have
already spent $100,000 on the road this year so far.
Forestry is a big issue - nothing is happening nationally in regards to
roads and forestry. The Rating Act is too rigid.
STDC – VL
Innovating Streets designs have been installed in Eltham and Waverley.
Community feedback has been quite negative, with 95% of people
thinking the troughs are ugly across both
extent of compliance by NPDC, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with NPDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such
re-evaluate its approach and that of
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of
methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s
and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
modelled water quality variables. Model predictions were evaluated
to be very good, good, satisfactory or unsatisfactory, following the criteria proposed by Moriasi
et al., 2007, outlined in Table 4.
Table 4: Performance criteria for statistics used in this study, from (Moriasi et al., 2007).
Performance Rating RSR NSE PBIAS
Very good RSR ≤ 0.50 NSE > 0.75 |PBIAS| <25
Good 0.50 < RSR ≤ 0.60 0.65 < NSE ≤ 0.75 25 ≤ |PBIAS| < 40
Satisfactory 0.60 < RSR ≤ 0.70 0.50 < NSE ≤
landscape and visual effects of the proposal in the context of the site and the
wider landscape setting, as well as effects on key public views.
This assessment has been prepared with reference to the NZILA Best Practice Note Landscape Assessment and
Sustainable Management 10.1 in conjunction with Information requirements for the assessment of landscape and
visual effects”2. The effects ratings and definitions used in Table 1 are provided in Appendix B. To determine the
overall nature and
responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder,
this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the
period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the