Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a high level in the year
CDEM Joint Committee Agenda March 2023 Web
allocation of the region’s water
resources.
page
19
Ngā ritenga pūtea
Financial trends
Actual
2022/23
Budget
2022/23
Actual
2021/22
Actual
2020/21
Actual
2019/20
Actual
2018/19
Actual
2017/18
Actual
2016/17
Actual
2015/16
Actual
2014/15
General rates 11.8m $11.8m $10.94m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m
Percent change 7.9% 7.9% 37.6% 0% 0% 4.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4%
General rates to
income 26.8% 25.4% 25.9% 15.7%
consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance has improved since the previous year’s
review.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024
while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a level that requires improvement.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024 year.
page
page
i
Table of contents
Page
1 Introduction 1
Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource
Policy and Planning Committee Agenda July 2024
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.4. Map Co-ordinates at point of activity (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM)
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.5. Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.6. Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to
________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
(NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.6 What is
achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remained at a high level in the year under
review.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024 year.
page
i
Table of contents
Page
1 Introduction 1
Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource Management Act 1991 1
1.1.1 Introduction 1