found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 878 (87%) of a total of 1007 consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024 year.
noted that the rates remission and postponement policies will be updated to
align with the respective policies of the New Plymouth, Stratford and South
Taranaki district councils.
Williamson/Walker
Taranaki Stadium Trust 2022/2023 Annual Report
8.1 Mr M Nield spoke to the memorandum requesting the members consider the
Taranaki Stadiums Trust’s 2022/2023 Annual Report.
8.2 Mr M Nield noted that he is a Trustee of the Taranaki Stadium Trust.
Resolved
That the Taranaki
monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
This report includes recommendations for the 2023-2024 year.
page
page
i
Table of contents
Page
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the
applications relating to the continued operation and
maintenance of the Mangorei HEPS.
Is a structure on, under, or over a river bed required? No
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed
(litres/second)?
10000
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed (cubic metres
per day)?
864000
What is the maximum volume proposed to be taken in a 7-
day period (m3)?
6048000
Please indicate below how your taking will vary through a typical year
Maximum or near to
Regional Air Quality Plan for Taranaki 2011
the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
2016/17
Actual
2015/16
Actual
2014/15
Actual
2013/14
General rates $10.94m $10.94m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m
Percent change 37.6% 37.6% 0% 0% 0% 4.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5%
General rates to
income 25.9% 22.8% 15.7% 18.3% 18.3% 22.2% 28.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9%
Rates per
$100,000 capital
value
$24.13 $24.13 $24.17 $25.80 $25.80 $14.17 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18
Total expenditure $41.2m $49.7m $41.2m $37.8m $37.8m $31.3m
administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2020-2021 year, consent
of water take are provided in the
attached Assessment of Environmental Effects.
This application is being made concurrently with six other
applications relating to the continued operation and
maintenance of the Mangorei HEPS.
Is a structure on, under, or over a river bed required? Yes
If a structure on, under, or over a river bed is needed please attach sketch plan of the structure including dimensions in the
"Documents" step.
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed