responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
under consent conditions and this showed that daily
volume limits and instantaneous abstraction rates were complied with for the majority of the monitoring
period. Self-monitoring of the Inglewood discharge showed that the discharge generally complied with
consent conditions.
During the year, NPDC demonstrated a high level of environmental and administrative performance with the
resource consents.
For reference, in the 2020-2021 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level
Operations and Regulatory Committee Agenda April 2023
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.4 Map Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer
the Stratford Power Station continued to be well managed with negligible
environmental effects as a process of the exercise of their consents.
Surface water abstraction was compliant with daily rate and volume. Process water discharges were
compliant with consent defined parameters. Surface water monitoring indicated negligible impacts from the
discharge of process waters.
The thermal tolerances within the receiving waters were not exceeded for the duration of the monitoring
period.
mean sea level pressure over the Southwest Pacific,
1981-2010. 96
Figure 4-1: Relative SLR rates up to and including 2019 (excluding Whangarei),
determined from longer sea-level gauge records at the four main ports
(Auckland, Wellington, Lyttelton, Dunedin) and shorter records from the
remaining sites. 99
Figure 4-2: Map of regional trend in SLR from 1993 to 1 September 2020 based on
satellite altimetry missions. 99
Figure 4-3: Average vertical land movement for near-coastal
and dust and loss of amenity value of air
d) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or ambient
concentrations of contaminants, or on or relating to mass discharge
rates
e) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise any adverse effects on
the environment
f) Any matter contained in Appendix V
g) Review of the conditions of consent and the timing and purpose of
the review
2.2 Appendix V of the RAQP is titled “Good management practices for
utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the
period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative
environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the STDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent