by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
decision; and in
accordance with section 79 of the Act, determines that it does not require further
information, further assessment of options or further analysis of costs and
benefits, or advantages and disadvantages prior to making a decision on this
matter.
Walker/Van Der Leden
8. Setting of Rates 2021/2022
8.1 Mr M J Nield, Director – Corporate Services, spoke to the memorandum setting the
rates for the 2020/2021 financial year. The rates are driven from the adopted 2021/2031
Recreational and fishery values: Moderate access for native fish. Presence of threatened
species. Important habitat for threatened native species. Very popular and highly valued
angling river. Very highly rated for recreational uses and values (some swimming).
Aesthetic and scenic values: Very highly rated for aesthetic and scenic values.
Comments: Median flow of 840L/s at SH3. Considerable water movement downstream from
Everett Park with some Grade 2 and 3 rapids. Water quantity and flows
through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high,
the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored
assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
appendix 2.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored
and dust and loss of amenity value of air
d) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or ambient
concentrations of contaminants, or on or relating to mass discharge
rates
e) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise any adverse effects on
the environment
f) Any matter contained in Appendix V
g) Review of the conditions of consent and the timing and purpose of
the review
2.2 Appendix V of the RAQP is titled “Good management practices for
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
page
06/22 -
utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and