the
region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is
SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with SDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans
renewed during the review period, and one consent to discharge emissions into the air at the
plant site.
Monitoring is carried out by both the Company and the Council. The Company monitors water abstraction
rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, effluent
loadings and soil and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council undertakes inspections of the plant site and
irrigation areas. Monitoring includes effluent quality checks and
Transport Agency Investment Proposal
TEFAR Targeted Enhanced Financial Assistance Rate
TIO Transport Investment Online
TP Transport Programme
TRC Taranaki Regional Council
TSIG Transport Special Interest Group
VDAM Vehicle Dimensions & Mass
WAC Walking Access Commission
WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant
Taranaki Regional Transport Committee Meeting - Minutes - Regional Transport Advisory Group Meeting
468
page
@BCL@F01353CD
extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and
includes links to all the detailed reports and other explanatory material relating to the
items considered by Councillors.
Significant matters
No rates change: The Council is budgeting for no change in general rates for the 2020/2021
financial year, rather than 3.8% as originally considered). “With the disruption caused by the
COVID-19 pandemic uppermost in mind, we’ve carefully tuned and trimmed our spending
and programmes while keeping any impacts to an absolute minimum,” says
maintained on the stream for the continuous measurement of flow rate and temperature.
Silver Fern Farms Ltd (meat processing plant) demonstrated an overall good level of environmental
performance.
Silver Fern Farms Ltd holds six resource consents, to allow it to maintain a dam in and to take water from
the Tawhiti Stream; to discharge to the stream and to land; and to discharge emissions into the air.
During the period under review, there were no incidents reported in relation to
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations
were recorded
from the physicochemical parameters analysed during the mid-summer survey conducted in February 2019,
when a moderately high discharge rate of well-treated wastewater characterised this system. No impacts of
the effluent discharge were indicated by MCI scores through the reach of the river surveyed.
During the year, STDC demonstrated a high level of environmental and administrative performance with the
resource consents held in relation to the Manaia WWTP. The Manaia WWTP was