established chlorophyll
a sampling protocols differ from those established more recently in the NOF, and results
cannot be directly translated to NOF bands.
Trend analysis was performed by applying a LOWESS fit (tension 0.4) to a time scatterplot
of the percentage cover of thick mats, and long filaments of periphyton for all sites and by
testing the significance of any trend using the Mann-Kendall test at the 5% level, followed by
Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) analysis.
Freshwater ecological monitoring state of the environment report - Taranaki Regional Council.
gardens and horticulture. They assess their member’s
gardens and provide visitors with information that truly reflects the garden
experiences. The NZGT assessment is an assurance that you are visiting a
quality garden.
Tūpare has been awarded a six-star rating by NZGT. This rating means Tūpare provides one of New
Zealand’s top garden experiences. These gardens achieve and maintain the highest levels of
presentation, design and plant interest throughout the year. They are the complete
gardens and horticulture. They assess their member’s
gardens and provide visitors with information that truly reflects the garden
experiences. The NZGT assessment is an assurance that you are visiting a
quality garden.
Tūpare has been awarded a six-star rating by NZGT. This rating means Tūpare provides one of New
Zealand’s top garden experiences. These gardens achieve and maintain the highest levels of
presentation, design and plant interest throughout the year. They are the complete
gardens and horticulture. They assess their member’s
gardens and provide visitors with information that truly reflects the garden
experiences. The NZGT assessment is an assurance that you are visiting a
quality garden.
Tūpare has been awarded a six-star rating by NZGT. This rating means Tūpare provides one of New
Zealand’s top garden experiences. These gardens achieve and maintain the highest levels of
presentation, design and plant interest throughout the year. They are the complete
details of the performance and extent of compliance by the CCCWSL, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with CCCWSL’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
the monitoring year. The associated analyses indicated that CO2 emissions, steam use per
unit of gas, and metal depositions all exhibited reduced or similar levels to previous reporting from 2015-
2019.
Additional ambient air quality monitoring for carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was
conducted per the Company’s request under conditions 8 and 9 from consent 4087-2. The results indicated
the KGTP was rated in the Ministry for Environment National Environmental Standards and …
air traffic control and navigational aids, refuelling services and significant areas of land
and buildings to serve commercial tenants. All of these facilities are situated on land at the Airport
designated within the District Plan.
Average annual passenger growth rate is anticipated to be 5% per annum and in the period from 2018 to
2038 air passenger volume through New Plymouth is expected to grow from 430,000 to 1,200,0001. A new
terminal building is currently under
been rated as
Good, as although the performance against most consent conditions with respect to the
administrative compliance was high, issues around testing of the integrity of the water take
pipeline and meeting the requirements of the Resource Management (Measurement and Reporting
of Water Takes) Regulations 2010 are yet to be resolved. Methanex have been open and
participative in their communication with regard to their progress on these issues.
For reference, in the 2015-2016 year, 71%
.................................................................................................. 14
Table 5 Descriptions of expected liquefaction induced ground damage for liquefaction damage
ratings......................................................................................................................................... 18
Table 6 Liquefaction damage ratings assigned to liquefaction susceptibility classes at different
MM shaking intensities. .............................................................................................................. 18
Table