Your search for 'rates' returned 2189 results.

Annual report 2015-2016

been rated as Good, as although the performance against most consent conditions with respect to the administrative compliance was high, issues around testing of the integrity of the water take pipeline and meeting the requirements of the Resource Management (Measurement and Reporting of Water Takes) Regulations 2010 are yet to be resolved. Methanex have been open and participative in their communication with regard to their progress on these issues. For reference, in the 2015-2016 year, 71%

Form 120: Discharge to air (including Coastal Marine Area)

_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.4 Map Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)

Form 112: Discharge stormwater and sediment from earthworks to water or land

Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property

Cold Creek consent monitoring 2018-2019

details of the performance and extent of compliance by the CCCWSL, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with CCCWSL’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely

Annual report 2012-2013

Freshwater ecological monitoring state of the environment report - Taranaki Regional Council.

Annual report 2013-2014

Freshwater ecological monitoring state of the environment report - Taranaki Regional Council.

Todd Energy Aquatic Centre monitoring 2020-2021

Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the NPDC’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and

Waikaikai Landfarm consent monitoring 2018-2019

considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the

Methanex consent monitoring 2019-2020

refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by Methanex, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or …

Liquefaction hazard in Taranaki - GNS Science

.................................................................................................. 14 Table 5 Descriptions of expected liquefaction induced ground damage for liquefaction damage ratings......................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 6 Liquefaction damage ratings assigned to liquefaction susceptibility classes at different MM shaking intensities. .............................................................................................................. 18 Table